Monday, January 26, 2009

The Practicing Congregation

My first class of this semester at Wesley Theological Seminary was Leading Formation. The class has an exciting and very broad description: "An exploration of how an emphasis on Christian faith practices - including justice, forgiveness, prayer and hospitality - can swerve as organizing principle for congregational life and administration."

In our first reading from The Practicing Congregation: Imagining and New Old Church by Diana Butler Bass I learned a new way of understanding church. This author approaches mainline denominations in a positive way. I've only read the intro and first chapter, but the key concept that I learned was this:

Though the church had been in decline, a new form of church has begun and is rising out of the ashes of mainline decline. This new type of church the author calls Intentional Congregations. These congregations include the Practicing and Emerging church movements. The key difference between these churches and other late 20th century churches is a focus on practice as apposed to program.

I remember my husband, other young adults, and I trying at various times to describe to older adults what we believe young people are searching for from churches. We talked about seeking authenticity, genuine welcome and acceptance into the family, and a place for open and deep dialogue. The response was frequently confusion, a yearning to understand how to communicate those things, or defensiveness. As I read from The Practicing Congregation I felt that my eyes were opened. Earlier generations of churches had focused on programs. They sought to connect new people with a social network and programs that met their needs. These models have worked, and still work in many cases.

However, it is a new language to try to understand Intentional Congregations. It is not primarily about a new style, or a new program. Perhaps it is primarily about a deep commitment to conversation and support. Perhaps it is primarily about seeing church as a place that challenges and changes, instead of a place that meets needs and is an exciting experience.

I'm excited to learn more because I believe there are many people, and many generations including my own who seek a more creative, post modern, theologically expansive, and yes even a bit messy church experience. One that feels more authentic. One that stretches us, and yet fills a deep need in our soul. We are starting to awaken to the idea that the American Culture is not synonymous with Christianity. We recognize that our culture cannot meet the need for Christ within us.

4 comments:

  1. I too have found it hard to verbalize what it is that seems to be missing in some church experiences I've had. I look forward to hearing more about what you learn about what makes that difference! :-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like what I think you're saying about the Intentional Congregations and what they're trying to do. However, I'm confused by the contrast with the "programmatic" church. What sorts of programs are considered common or outmoded in main line churches? A lot of the mega churches were being even more broadly programmatic, having programs for helping people do their taxes or having young people get together to play video games. Mega churches are, at least by the criterion of membership, successful. Can you say a bit more about what the dying churches are being criticized for?

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You may find it helpful to read a piece that Diana Butler Bass wrote a bit before The Practicing Congregation: "Process, Not Program: Adult Faith Formation for Vital Congregations." See http://www.congregationalresources.org/ProcessNotProgram/About.asp.

    ReplyDelete